Interactive Research Article

Research Explorer

An interactive research companion connecting the question, study, evidence, measurement, analysis, simulation and safety-system implications.

Experiment 1Observed
N = 31
Courier riders · MRRT + HPT + knowledge
Experiment 2Observed
N = 264
Motorcyclists · MRSAA / SA
Total SAObserved
23.2%
Reported mean score
FrameworkObserved
5 domains
IMSEF-MY action architecture
Welcome to the research layer

This is where the research stops being a PDF.

We are building an interactive companion around the research programme: the paper, the experiments, the measurement logic, the reported data, the framework and the controlled simulations all live in one place. The purpose is not to replace the publication, but to let a reader move from question → evidence → measurement → analysis → interpretation → next research question.

The current anchor is Paper 1. Future papers, slides and research materials can be added as separate objects and connected to the same evidence architecture.

How to use this Explorer
  1. 1. Start with Research. Get the big picture and choose the research artefact.
  2. 2. Open Paper 1. Read page by page; jump to sections, figures and references.
  3. 3. Follow the evidence. Move into Study, Methods and Data to see how claims are measured and reported.
  4. 4. Experiment carefully. Monte Carlo and Framework Lab are clearly marked as simulated/scenario layers.
  5. 5. Return to Framework Lab. Explore how the research can connect to a wider safety-system architecture.
Observed
Directly reported in the published study.
Derived
Calculated from reported study quantities.
Simulated
Synthetic results generated by this Explorer.
Scenario
User-defined intervention assumptions; not an empirical finding.
The bigger picture

From rider capability to a safety system.

A working conceptual map of how the research threads fit together. The layout makes the intended direction explicit: capability → perception → awareness → risk expression → crash risk → safety layers.

Working conceptual map
Layer 1 · Capability
Training
▼
Layer 2 · Perception
Hazard Perception
▼
Layer 3 · Awareness
Situational Awareness
▼
▼
Risk expression
Fatigue
A rider-state dimension that can shape how capability is expressed.
Risk expression
Riding Behaviour
Observed riding behaviour through which risk may become expressed.
▼
Outcome layer
Crash Risk
The common outcome layer used to connect rider-level risk expression with downstream safety interventions.
▼
▼
Safety layer
Technology
Assistive and engineering measures that can add another protection layer.
Safety layer
Exposure
Controls that can reduce or reshape exposure to high-risk riding conditions.
▼
System outcome
Safety System
01 · Capability

Training, hazard perception and situational awareness form the cognitive-capability thread.

02 · Risk expression

Fatigue and riding behaviour are shown as risk-expression dimensions before the crash-risk outcome.

03 · Safety layers

Technology and exposure are shown as downstream protection/control layers that converge on the wider safety system.

Scientific boundary: this is a programme-level conceptual synthesis, not a single tested causal model. The arrows communicate the working research logic and should not be read as estimated path coefficients or confirmed causal effects.
Research library

One Explorer, many research artefacts.

The architecture is intentionally expandable. Today we are working on Paper 1; later, Paper 2, Slide 1, a thesis chapter, a dataset or a training package can become another evidence-connected object without rewriting the whole Explorer.

SOURCE INDEX · v0.1
Scientific boundary

The Explorer never changes a published p-value. Instead, it changes the assumptions that generate a new simulated result. Simulation is labelled separately from empirical evidence.

Built to grow

A future Paper 2 or Slide 1 can be added to the source index, then linked to its own figures, evidence, methods and datasets. The goal is a living research archive rather than a collection of disconnected pages.